Questions On The Fourth Amendment - 1813 Words

1) Describe Fourth Amendment as you understand including all areas and places it covers? Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures of certain papers, books, documents etc. Rules are not violated in it. There must be probable reason because in order to arrest a particular person without a search warrant. It possesses an oath or affirmation from the government. It has two fundamental rights as Right to privacy and Right to freedom. Search occurs when it has a correct reason that was obligated by the government people. Private individuals are violated from this amendment. A seizure happens the owner must has a right documents with him on his own property, if not the documents is seized and the person gets arrested. Sometimes the property belongs to other possessor but in mistake reasonable person gets involved in the task. The banning of unreasonable searches can violate many things to be happen. If a person is produced to court without a proper reason the judge cannot accept it, because it requires a perfect condition. A man initiates a case over the other it must be very strong and has legitimacy exception privacy in it. Legitimate Expectation has two tests for privacy namely Subjective and Objective. In Subjective plaintiff expects more privacy very honestly, where as Objective refers to the same and similar privacy but in certain conditions only. The Exclusionary Rule: This rule holds that if police violates your constitutional rights inShow MoreRelatedQuestions On The Fourth Amendment1770 Words   |  8 PagesHOMEWORK: 1 1. Describe Fourth Amendment as you understand including all areas and places it covers? A. The main aim of us constitution about the fourth amendment law is to protect the people from unreasonable searches and seizes and also the right of the people to be secure from persons, papers, effects etc....They are no right to search or seize any individuals without any search warrant. They must not be violated by warrants issued without any cause, supported by oath or affirmation, or not describingRead MoreQuestions On Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence2218 Words   |  9 Pages†¢ Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is primarily concentrated in four areas: 1) defining â€Å"searches†; 2) the Warrant Requirement, in which warrantless searches are semantically precluded except in specific and tightly constricted situations; 3) the Probable Cause Requirement, whose exclusive provisions are closely associated with the Warrant Requirement’s proscription of police inquiries into same; and, 4) the exclusionary rule, which presumptively excludes any information or evidence gatheredRead MoreSearch And Seizure : Lesson Plan1069 Words   |  5 PagesSearch and Seizure Lesson Plan Teacher: Miradije Rashiti Grade Level: 11th Grade Subject Area: U.S. Civics Content Focus: Fourth Amendment Relevant State and National Content Standards/Common Core Standards CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.3 Evaluate various explanations for actions or events and determine which explanation best accords with textual evidence, acknowledging where the text leaves matters uncertain. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.7 Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presentedRead MoreThe Second Amendment And The Fourth Amendment1384 Words   |  6 Pagesthis reason, the agencies and enterprises have been called into question of infringement of the fourth. Using the lessons learned from history, the framers of the constitutions created the fourth amendment, which protects from unreasonable searches, and the fifth amendment, which prevents a person from incriminating himself or herself, to create a government with just laws, but with the advancement in technology, the fourth amendment needs to expand its policies to fit the changes in modern societyRead MoreName Of The Case: Katz V. The United States. 389 Us 3471203 Words   |  5 Pagesarguing that the recordings violated his fourth amendment right to which the Court of Appeals rejected this point, noting the absence of a physical intrusion into the phone booth itself. The Court granted certiorari. Issue: Does the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures require the police to obtain a search warrant in order to wiretap a public pay phone? Holding: Although the Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations andRead MoreU.s. Supreme Court And The Fourth Amendment1564 Words   |  7 PagesThe U.S. Supreme Court and the Fourth Amendment Since the founding of the American Democracy, partisanship has always been a major problem when it comes to political aspects of the law. The Constitution was designed to implement laws into our country that would make our governing body run smoother with fewer conflicts. However, when dealing with Democracy based on the â€Å"people’s word† it is hard to avoid such conflicts. Since each citizen in our country has the right to freedom of speech and thoughtRead MoreApplication Of The Gps Monitoring Program1488 Words   |  6 Pagesindividual found to be a recidivist sex offender must be ordered to partake in the sex offender monitoring system. Grady raised objections to the program arguing because of the unreasonable searches the structure of the program allows that his Fourth Amendment rights would be violated. The purpose of the GPS monitoring program enforced by the Division of Adult Correction is to manage the risk assessment of individuals who enter into public society after having been imprisoned. As participants in theRead MoreImagine You Are On A Family Road Trip You Drive Through1403 Words   |  6 Pagesyou are on a family road trip; you drive through a red light. Next thing you know you re getting pulled over and the officer orders you and your family to get out of the car. Either the officer wants to search your vehicle or arrest you. Is the question this legal or illegal for the officer to do? I believe that search and seizure are ethical because it protects citizens from an unlawful entry and provides protection for law enforcement in case a person is dangerous or to provide evidence to useRead MoreMapp V. Ohio ( 1961 )1619 Words   |  7 Pagesthe Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures,† which cannot be used in the law on the stat e level or in criminal prosecutions in state courts, and in addition, federal criminal law prosecutions in federal courts (MAPP v. OHIO. They Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law.) The Supreme Court successfully completed this by use of selective incorporation. In Mapp the association was within the incorporation of the provisions, of the Fourth Amendment whichRead MoreLaw Enforcement s Use Of Illegal Search Warrants1009 Words   |  5 PagesLaw Enforcement’s use of illegal search warrants in violation of the fourth amendment rights. This is the case of Jones v. United States (2012). Antoine Jones owned a nightclub in the District of Columbia. In 2004, a joint Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Metropolitan Police Department task force began investigating Jones for narcotics violations. During the course of the investigation, a Global Positioning System (GPS) device was installed on Jones s Jeep Grand Cherokee, without a valid